Beauty, ideals, virtue, art, creation — transcend the artist, the creator, the artisan and the engineer, the philosopher, the object
Not merely as an idealised ideal, which we can’t touch
Of course the ideal is our vision,
then we merely strive to get closer to it, but can never reach it
The former is the abstraction — untethered to any constrains
The latter is the reality — by definition constrained by, well, reality
The interesting part is how little overlap there is between the instrument which temporarily reflects it, projects it — and that ideal, that beauty, that virtue
Artist is NOT like his art
Artist is not beautiful
Artist is not very creative
Peak of artists creativity is in the making of his artwork
And the most beautiful thing in the artist’s world is that beautiful artwork
Other than that?
Artist is, typically, just a piece of shit
The god-like beauty that he was an instrument of channeling — rubbed off VERY little on the artist
Many non-artists know far more beauty
Engineer is not like his machine, not like his system
The latter is engineered to perfection
It’s profoundly coherent
It’s tempered by friction of the real world
Engineer is nothing like that
He’s just a fucking dude
Maybe a bit more nerdy
Maybe sometimes his systems will inspire him to engineer something in his life too
Usually not
Many non-engineers build far superior systems in their lives
Philosopher is not like his philosophy
Usually he’s not really interested in answering the hardest questions
He’s too busy doing fucking philosophy
But no, the spontaneous thinker, the armchair philosopher, is also a piece of fucking shit
His “cool ideas” have none of the rigour that a pro-philosopher engages
But yes, either of them have moment of glory
When this sharp inquiry and utter inspired curiosity is directed at a concrete problem, and it illuminates it
Neither of them is like that fleeting moment of incisiveness
Few things they look at — do they look at in this way
But sometimes they find themselves overlapping with that transcendental clarity
That vanguard of human perception
And of course beauty
The beautiful are nothing like the beauty
They merely fleetingly reflect some of THE beauty in their superficial bearing, sometimes
They remind us to pursue beauty
Which we then fail
Or worse still: distort it
To pursue beauty is to give more attention to beauty
Recognise the beauty
Then make everything beautiful and beautifully
And while at it continue paying attention to beauty and cherishing it and savouring it
So let me repeat
We’re nothing like our fleeting moments of creativity, genius, virtue, excellence
The first lesson is to completely separate the medium and the message
Else you shall be profoundly disappointed
And beguiled and deluded
This cuts both ways,
That wonderful artist and that virtuous leader — are nothing like their work, nothing like their cause
They are human, and humans are, comparatively, fucking pathetic
And it’s ok
And likewise,
That most disgusting human you can think of,
He too carries that capacity within
He too has that delicate, pristine, innocent gemstone within him
He is human, after all
He may almost never be able to access it
But it’s there
When you separate THE HUMAN from a human — the confusion is dispelled
You really have no choice if you find yourself being the medium of something far far greater than yourself
It’s really your duty
But often you won’t even be able to resist it
It won’t benefit you. Like I said — it will likely barely rub off on you at all
It will benefit others, however
Some of them will be reminded of their humanity
The real lesson is to strive for more excellence, more beauty, more inspiration, more artfulness and tastefulness — in everything we do, everything we lay our eyes upon
But usually we only do so in some narrow domain, almost by chance, where we somehow miraculously happen to recognise that profound VALUE and truth IN AND OF ITSELF,
and pursue it then in spite of ourselves,
in spite of it’s failure to benefiting us on the outside, or the inside, usually…
…But if we could only look a little deeper,
and then a little more generally,
MAYBE we’d see that it’s not about that one thing, one obsession,
it’s about the BEAUTY, the EXCELLENCE, the LOVE, the CREATIVITY itself,
and it should inspire our entire lives
and those qualities are good in and of themselves and as such worth pursuing for themselves alone
and they are not limited to this one thing which inspired us, this one fleeting moment of recognition, of espying true beauty, excellence, love, perfection
but that it is the ideal to strive for EVERYWHERE,
ruthlessly