Philosophy World

The Dreaded Societal Expectations

Societal expectations are great

Societal expectations are underrated

 

Let’s bifurcate societal expectations into a 2×2 grid of categories:

positive, desirable values, qualities

negative, stifling dogmas

-clear, explicit, known, indisputable

tacit, hidden, Chesterton’s fence

 

In a thriving society — you can expect it’s MOSTLY positive

That’s why it outperforms other societies

And that’s why it’s best men outperform best men of other societies

That would entail superior values

 

How is that a bad thing?

 

Let’s look at the problem of explicit vs tacit benefits

If it’s beneficial, and CLEARLY SO — then again — how is this a bad thing?

How is this a bad thing that SOCIETY pressures you to CLEARLY be better?

I don’t understand

 

And then with tacit values — that’s a little bit more complicated

If it’s tacit, hidden — you can’t immediately verify if it’s positive or not

You can then trust the tradition, trust the rule, trust the system, trust the dogma,

Or you can reject it, just as blindly

The only NON-blind thing to do is to VERIFY it, the best you can

And think harder about it

And remain largely agnostic,

Reconcile that “this which persists — likely persists for a reason”,

reconcile it withprogress happens and by definition eradicates the outdated old”

 

And these are all the options

Either you know it’s a GOOD idea,

or you SUSPECT it’s a good idea,

or you have strong suspicion that it’s a bad idea

With good ideas — you only stand to benefit by the society PRESSURING you to do better

With bad ideas — you stand to benefit by choosing your own opinion, your own experience, over blind dogma

You still have that choice

 

So what’s the root of the negative view of SOCIETAL EXPECTATIONS?

If it’s merely an optional thing — you choose to abide by it when it benefits you and the society — and you’re free to ignore it when you suspect it’s not for you — then this is ONLY EVER a good thing, is it not?

What’s the root of the negative connotation?

 

Clearly, we don’t like pressure, right?

We don’t like being told what to be like

And we don’t like being told that we’re NOT GOOD ENOUGH

Clearly this causes a lot of distress

Who wants more distress in their lives

“Fuck that”, we say

 

I think this is the wrong answer,

You can’t NOT have distress

You can kill yourself, you can die — and that’s the end of WORLD, SOCIETY, LIFE, GOD — expecting things from you

But as long as you’re alive — you can’t escape the… POSSIBILITY

The possibility of WHAT will become of you

And the choice to WILL that becoming

 

To deny it, to reject the POSSIBILITY — is to deny life

THIS INCLUDES the POSSIBILITIES that SOCIETY has designed for you

 

OF COURSE you could, and often should — reject the world’s idea for yourself

But you do it not in saying fuck them

You do it by having a BETTER IDEA

A BETTER PLAN for yourself

 

And of course — to improve something — it usually takes quite significant understanding of that thing, IN ITS CURRENT FORM

That’s how you know it’s strengths and weaknesses — and can improve it

SOCIETAL EXPECTATIONS are no different

 

So, to conclude, and put it simply,

A Stepford traditionalist, a career-zombie, a religious puppet, a pompous patriot — I do find those types tremendously pathetic, and quite dead inside

But I feel the same way about the “FUCK THIS” crowd, so eager to deny all values because they make them feel uncomfortable about their LOSERDOM

 

Look around yourself with inspiration, love

Espy what you value, what inspires you, what fills you with exhilaration and vitality

Then go do those things, get those things, become those things, live and breathe those things

Look a little longer at things others value — MAYBE there’s a reason. See what they value and see yourself in their humanity, know yourself thus

And if it’s not your thing, perhaps just let it pass for now

With no attitude, no disrespect, no dogmatism, no pride… nothing really

Only curiosity, open mind and respect