There are mostly only two modes:
–You help yourself and others by BUILDING something that they will VOLUNTARILY pay you for — because it benefits them.. and you benefit from the revenue
-Or you just want to help others — therefore you… just do
There’s VERY LITTLE gradient in between those two
The first option is of course building a glorious business
Finding something profoundly needed in this world
(That the world actually KNOWS is needed)
+of course, you don’t have to build it yourself entirely.
You can hire and be hired,
You can invest
etc
This is of course unimpeachable already in theory
AND in practice
The theory is irrefutable, and EMPIRICAL DATA, literally every instance of real wealth being created, involves it:
VALUE is value
You CREATE value — there’s MORE VALUE in the world
And people want more value too — so they pay you for it
There’s no fucking debate here
There’s no secret
Go build something glorious, that world actually cares about, that solves problems we have or saves their time or something — and you get paid
And if you can’t build something glorious — just build something GOOD
Like the rest of the society does, most the time
Anyone who doesn’t start their pitch by admitting this fundamental truth, either:
-doesn’t fucking get it = ergo is a fraud
-or can’t teach you that, can’t help you with that
Now,
The second option is — you just teach
You benefit the world not by yourself BUILDING, or contributing to building quite directly…
but by DISSEMINATING your insights
Now,
history OF COURSE shows that this model is basically… altruistic
Sometimes you get hired by academia
Sometimes even your book sells like crazy
Sometimes your advise is directly sought-after, and your time is precious
But it’s RARELY the expected outcome,
Therefore to go down this path — is a matter of calling
Maybe you will get by fine. Rarely you will see glorious success. And often you’ll see the world leave you behind
And indeed, those that did impact others with their thought, vision, insight — they were serious
They were not armchair philosophers
They knew their shit
They were as serious as the businessmen
Understanding is a venture
…They were as serious as the businessmen,
EXCEPT
Matter of seriousness in business is the free cash flow created
But how do you measure seriousness in THOUGHT?
Do you rely on academic gatekeepers?
Maybe on the sentiment of the venerable hoi polloi?
Maybe it’s historians who will decide?
Maybe it’s FOLLOWERS? VOTERS? ACOLYTES? Who swear by your insights and wisdom?
The thought-business, the helping-others business, is largely a thankless work
You can’t measure it
Even if you changed someone’s life — how do you know it was you?
And not ultimately their hard work? Or some inner capacity to even appreciate your wisdom, when so many were deaf to it? Etc.
Now imagine taking money for it
Imagine putting a price on it
Of course there are precedents when we put number on an IDEA: it’s called INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
But that again, exists in the realm of business
It’s, for all purposes, basically an asset
It generates revenue, and that revenue would NOT go to you, the creator, if not for that protection
But good luck claiming your cheap little INSIGHTS to be an INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Likewise there is the business model of consulting
But again — this is essentially a BUSINESS. It falls into the first category: you building a business (of helping other businesses, FOR money)
Therefore I assert:
-Either you go ahead and help others already. Give them the best you have, FOR FREE
-OR if you can build something that scales and they voluntarily buy from you — you do
But I don’t believe in existence of much middle ground between the two
The MODEL in which you ADVERTISE AND PROMOTE and SELL your PRICELESS ADVISE — kind of undermines the notion that it really is so invaluable
It is of course at odds with the DECLARED goal — which is to JUST HELP OTHERS, just BENEFIT the world
AND if you wanted money — why didn’t you just start business? Or went to work for someone whose mission you believe in?
That’s the most DIRECT way, without worrying how much is your VISION really worth… just go ahead offer it to the market — and see what it makes of it
Is there space in-between?
Is there a reality in which you decide to get rich THROUGH your PRICELESS ADVICE?
Perhaps rarely, yes
And even then — MARKET should decide
It should be priced as low as the priceless advice of everyone else…
…but the enthusiasm and passion of people around it should drive it as a business — not you PROMISING something wonderful
It should literally be so accessible that one gets a full flavour of it for free
And then revenue generated almost entirely VOLUNTARILY, from people VOLUNTARILY ASKING FOR MORE
That, I think , would corroborate the VALUE of it
….and of course, the world is most likely NOT ready, for your priceless advice,
and AGAIN — that’s good
You selling it harder only undermines it more
You can’t COMPEL someone to UNDERSTAND something he just doesn’t get
So no, I don’t believe in this model
If you need both money and impact — go look for a place where you can maximise both.
If you want great purpose and great impact — start a great business.
Make people waste less time, or something
If your business is one thing but you’ve more to offer, if you’ve PRICELESS ADVICE… then GO AND SHARE IT.
Obviously for free.
If the MARKET believes that it IS possible to PRICE it — and puts a price on it — then go ahead and TAKE it. Let them pay you, if they think it’s glorious what you’re saying, and to shake your hand and all
But the idea that you’ve priceless advice, and are now putting PRICE on it? Promoting it? CONVINCING OTHERS that you have the knowledge?
It’s nonsense. If you had it — you’d prove it
….oh and finally my favourite part:
“I proved it in my previous business”
If you did — then either continue benefiting the world with that business…
…or SHARE your advice for FREE.
You don’t need money anyway, right?
You’re after impact now?
So MAXIMISE it by actually giving it to the world
Write a book, not a fucking online course for 5 year olds
I’m not anti-gurus
Obviously not anti-success
NOT sceptical of billionaire oligarchs, for the most part. Know their strengths and their limitations
But I think my gauntlet holds:
-If you’re good at what you do — continue doing it and THUS benefiting the world
-And if you think your IDEAS should also benefit the world — go share them, in a SERIOUS way, with 0 grift and 0 hidden incentives
It’s that simple
All this middle ground, where you claim you want to MAINLY HELP OTHERS, while also benefiting yourself massively, is USUALLY a grift
Again: you benefit YOURSELF AND OTHERS through a SERIOUS BUSINESS,
And if you JUST want to share your PRICELESS ADVICE for the GOOD OF THE POSTERITY… you just do
You just share it
Or maybe you write a serious book, so that someone actually can criticise you for it… and at least you’ll know that you tried, but WEREN’T REALLY a “thought leader”, maybe that wasn’t your calling… after all