One could conceive of selfishness compass
It would comprise of two axes
Horizontal could measure the degree of self-absorption, self-interest
Vertical could measure the degree of IGNORANCE
At an extreme left there would be utter self-absorption, utter self-obsession,
with utmost disregard for the interest of others,
An utterly solipsistic perspective
No inhibition in disregarding others, discarding others, using others and dispensing with others, sacrificing others
And belief in no value of others, or the world
Only you
Only you
On the far right there would be utter self-sacrifice, if you will
Or would there?
Actually it wouldn’t
If you care for all mankind — you care also for yourself
Therefore you wouldn’t sacrifice yourself
You would thrive
But you would never thrive at the expense of others
And maybe you’d see others win over yourself
Maybe it would give you more pleasure
This is the realm of utter LOVE, selfless-inspiration, love-inspiration, empathetic love
You selfishly make others win, because it makes you experience love
You love seeing others win
How would this horizontal axis work thus?
Why would someone crack your skull just to see what your mind is made of,
while someone else would give their last money to you, because you looked like you needed it more?
I would not know, would I
Empathy vs sociopathy?
(Delusional) belief in something higher, vs (delusional) belief only in existence of oneself and one’s goals?
The latter ties into the vertical axis: IGNORANCE
At the bottom there would be one utterly ignorant of the rest of the humanity
And how the rest of the humanity engages in mutually-beneficial transactions
Some more explicit, some less
At the extreme, it looks like the extreme left, extreme selfishness, it’s very similar
Extreme ignorance of others, and their feelings and their interests,
and extreme ignorance of the value of treating them well, or treating them anything better than horribly
And at the peak there would be the opposite: profound understanding of human relationships
On a business level: the free and voluntary exchange of goods and services
On an interpersonal level: the tacit balance sheet of every relationship
On a societal level: social contract, social order, tradition, law, morality, value of community, value of the state, value of cooperation, value of peaceful conflict resolution…
Indeed it is a matter of ignorance
Some of those rules we learn intuitively
But that is a problem — because we rarely learn them well enough
And then we fight with one another — instead of building wonderful things together
And some of us have little intuition so they barely learn it at all
They treat others like shit, get shit in return, and wonder why the world doesn’t appreciate them
Alas they are not even aware of all the rules they transgressed, and in their estimation they were being upright
Now, to populate this compass with data,
Most likely it would go diagonally, from bottom left (selfish and ignorant) — to upper right (enlightened and loving),
The centre would be evenly populated,
By more empathetic people and less empathetic, but nothing extreme
And by people more ignorant of the nature of relations, and less
I think this is a useful mental model, a useful heuristic
(of course not a deterministic model of the world and society — a heuristic)
It’s useful to place oneself on it
Useful to place others on it
The very act of placing others on it makes one LESS ignorant of society and relations — therefore elevating oneself in this compass
Likewise placing oneself
Obviously we must learn to get along
Trivial as it sounds: it’s simply a matter of life and death
Of not killing one another
Instead curing cancer, for instance
And of not ruining each other’s lives, fighting and hating one another
Instead loving each other
Simple